United States v. Billy Taylor, No. 23-2482 (8th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2482 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Billy Joe Taylor Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith ____________ Submitted: July 23, 2024 Filed: July 31, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Before Billy Taylor pleaded guilty to money laundering and conspiracy to commit health-care fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1347, 1349, 1957, the district court1 refused to release his seized assets and denied his request to change attorneys. Although he 1 The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. argues that these rulings violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, he cannot challenge them after unconditionally pleading guilty. See Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973) (explaining that a guilty plea “break[s] . . . the chain of events,” meaning it forecloses “independent clams relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights” that “preceded it in the criminal process”); United States v. Dewberry, 936 F.3d 803, 807 (8th Cir. 2019) (holding that a defendant waived a Sixth Amendment challenge by pleading guilty). Nor can he argue that his plea was unknowing or involuntary, given that he first raised the point in his reply brief. See Jenkins v. Winter, 540 F.3d 742, 751 (8th Cir. 2008) (“Claims not raised in an opening brief are deemed waived.”). Finally, his argument that appointed counsel provided ineffective assistance will have to await collateral review. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 827 (8th Cir. 2006) (explaining that ineffective-assistance claims are “more properly raised in a separate motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255”). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
