United States v. Taliaferro Thompson, No. 24-2094 (8th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2094 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Taliaferro D. Thompson, also known as Taliaferro Thompson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: December 23, 2024 Filed: December 30, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Taliaferro Thompson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery and a firearm offense pursuant to a written plea 1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. agreement containing an appeal waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively unreasonable. We conclude that the appeal wavier is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (stating that this court reviews de novo the validity and applicability of an appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (stating that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing the waiver would not result in a miscarriage of justice). Having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw and dismiss the appeal. ______________________________ -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.